One of the unfortunate aspects of estate planning is the terminology. There are lots of words and phrases that sound the same, which can be confusing to laypeople. For instance, there are living wills and Wills -- these are two entirely different things. And there are powers of attorney (by which you appoint an agent to do something for you) and powers of appointment -- again, these are two entirely different things.
What is a power of appointment? It's a power granted to the beneficiary of a trust to pass on his or her trust interest upon death. For instance, let's say that I'm the beneficiary of a trust containing $5 million (hurray!). I have the right to all income from the trust, and I get the entire principal when I turn age 40. But what if I die when I'm 38, before the trust has been distributed to me? In that case, the question is: what happens to the trust? The trust document should explain where the money goes -- to charity, to my descendants, to other trust beneficiaries, etc. But in some trusts, the beneficiary is given "first crack" at disposing of the property. For instance, the trust might say something like:
Upon the death of the beneficiary, any property remaining in the trust shall be distributed to such persons and organizations as the beneficiary may by his Will appoint by specific reference to this power.
The above is a power of appointment.
There are two major issues involving powers of appointment.
1. Did the beneficiary exercise it? You'll see the phrase "specific reference" in the above language. This is intended to address a situation where the beneficiary dies with a Will that (for example) gives all of his property to his wife. Does that include the trust property of which he is beneficiary? No. Instead, the beneficiary should have language added to his Will specifically mentioning the power of appointment, invoking the trust's name, the date it was created, the paragraph number that grants the power, etc.
2. How can the beneficiary exercise the power? Can the beneficiary exercise his power of appointment by creating a new trust, of which his wife or children are beneficiaries? Can the terms of this new trust be different from the terms of the trust that created the power in the first place? These questions can be answered via careful drafting of the power of appointment language.
In my next post I'll talk a bit about the tax ramifications of powers of appointment.



Don't forget about Durable Powers of Attorney as opposed to ordinary Powers of Attorney and Special Powers of Appointment as opposed to General Powers of Appointment.
Then, of course, there's the death tax, which is also the estate tax. And as you know, fewer oppose the estate tax than the death tax. Ugh.
Posted by: J | January 08, 2007 at 03:04 PM
Hello!!!
Nice and well posted that you made!! Its very informative and Knowledgeable for
every one who visited to your site/blog. Keep up the good work..Cheers
Best Regards,
Freddie Aguilar
http://www.hihcorp.com
Posted by: Freddie Aguilar | May 22, 2007 at 01:34 PM
Hey, that's deadly news! I work with Corporate Store Front, a company that makes corporations and offers Joint Trust and Wills. Just wanted to share, their service is easy and effortless.
Best regards,
Abby Copuyoc
http://www.corporatestorefront.com
Posted by: Corporate Store Front | August 17, 2007 at 06:56 PM
Its very informative and Knowledgeable for
every one who visited to your blog. Keep up the good work..
Posted by: Free wills | December 23, 2008 at 02:15 AM
UyhaqD flgoey72FdAa1nc830fNdKu
Posted by: amily | March 04, 2009 at 05:01 PM
Bogert, the encyclopedia of trust law along with Stevenson who developed trust law in America (despite its conflict with English law because of feudal notions rather than Constitutional law about property) claims that Powers of Appointment are property as much as a house, or money.
If so, the attempt to remove powers of appointment from the person appointed is as much theft or embezzlement as the actual removal of personal or real property. Since once created, property must be transferred, sold, or gifted, transfer to Executor or Trustee is theft or embezzlement unless the transfer is the sole act of the donor, and the donor has no preconditioned obligation under a previous will or trust - as Co Executor or first life beneficiary - to distribute all property within that obligation. To do otherwise, and distribute "held property subject to life beneficiary interest only" to attempt to make it into fee simple is theft of valuable property whose value is measurable by the extent to which the estate is included in that power - often the entire estate - if the power has been usurped inappropriately.
Posted by: pbr | March 09, 2009 at 08:54 PM
Great blog, these are issues that always draw my interest. Thanks for sharing and I will check your new blog.
Posted by: Richard Stabile Bergen County Real Estate | March 29, 2009 at 11:08 AM
The information on the power of appointment came pretty useful, thanks a lot !
Posted by: Costa Rica Real Estate | August 31, 2009 at 04:16 PM
First, thanks for this remarkable article. I have a question, how if someone died, and he/she doesn't have any relatives, and he doesn't make any will. What will happened with his/her assets?
Posted by: Bankruptcy Discharge | November 11, 2009 at 11:15 AM
Its very informative and Knowledgeable for
every one who visited to your blog.
Posted by: bankruptcy records | November 29, 2009 at 08:49 PM
From Obvious,transfer organization explanation twice newspaper ticket include jump interpretation damage feel various probably associate use anything liberal wage existence hardly bind commit properly our bed event within variety occur wait worker south population end police strange where enterprise pick settlement repeat club factor gas blue index fairly nobody alright victim merely inside sing close people concentration afford author increasingly double security permanent voice authority attempt procedure so break study area cup strength need none fund mind marry description hang job fashion attempt division row issue object amount to follow or exercise
Posted by: Conductman | December 06, 2009 at 06:59 AM